Back to Photovoltaics
Life Cycle Costing
The table below allows you quick access to these sections.
Description
Life Cycle Analysis
Formulas
Doing a life-cycle cost analysis (LCC) gives the total cost of your PV system - including all expenses incurred over the life of the system. There are two reasons to do an LCC analysis: 1) to compare different power options, and 2) to determine the most cost-effective system designs. For some applications there are no options to small PV systems so comparison of other power supplies is not an issue. The PV system produces power where there was no power before. For these applications the initial cost of the system is the main concern. However, even if PV power is the only option, a life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis can be helpful for comparing costs of different designs and/or determining whether a hybrid system would be a cost-effective option. An LCC analysis allows the designer to study the effect of using different components with different reliabilities and lifetimes. For instance, a less expensive battery might be expected to last 4 years while a more expensive battery might last 7 years. Which battery is the best buy? This type of question can be answered with an LCC analysis.
Some might want to compare the cost of different power supply options such as photovoltaics, fueled generators, or extending utility power lines. The initial costs of these options will be different as will the costs of operation, maintenance, and repair or replacement. A LCC analysis can help compare the power supply options. The LCC analysis consists of finding the present worth of any expense expected to occur over the reasonable life of the system. To be included in the LCC analysis, any item must be assigned a cost, even though there are considerations to which a monetary value is not easily attached. For instance, the cost of a gallon of diesel fuel may be known; the cost of storing the fuel at the site may be estimated with reasonable confidence; but, the cost of pollution caused by the generator may require an educated guess. Also, the competing power systems will differ in performance and reliability. To obtain a good comparison, the reliability and performance must be the same. This can be done by upgrading the design of the least reliable system to match the power availability of the best. In some cases, you may have to include the cost of redundant components to make the reliability of the two systems equal. For instance, if it takes one month to completely rebuild a diesel generator, you should include the cost of a replacement unit in the LCC calculation. A meaningful LCC comparison can only be made if each system can perform the same work with the same reliability.
LCC Calculation
The life-cycle cost of a project can be calculated using the formula:
LCC = C + Mpw + E pw + R pw - S pw.
where the pw subscript indicates the present worth of each factor.
Future costs must be discounted because of the time value of money. One dollar received today is worth more than the promise of $1 next year, because the $1 today can be invested and earn interest. Future sums of money must also be discounted because of the inherent risk of future events not occurring as planned. Several factors should be considered when the period for an LCC analysis is chosen. First is the life span of the equipment. PV modules should operate for 20 years or more without failure. To analyze a PV system over a 5-year period would not give due credit to its durability and reliability. Twenty years is the normal period chosen to evaluate PV projects. However, most engine generators won't last 20 years so replacement costs for this option must be factored into the calculation if a comparison is to be made.
To discount future costs, the multipliers presented in the tables below can be used. The first table lists Single Present Worth factors. These are used to discount a cost expected to occur in a specific year, such as a battery replacement in year 10 of a project. The second table lists Uniform Present Worth factors that are used to discount annually recurring costs, such as the annual fuel cost of a generator. To use the tables, simply select the column under the appropriate discount rate and read the multiplier opposite the correct year or span of years.
Single Present Worth Factors
Net Discount Rate
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Year
1
0.99
0.98
0.971
0.962
0.952
0.943
0.935
0.926
0.917
2
0.961
0.925
0.907
0.89
0.873
0.857
0.842
3
0.942
0.915
0.889
0.864
0.84
0.816
0.794
0.772
4
0.924
0.888
0.855
0.823
0.792
0.763
0.735
0.708
5
0.951
0.906
0.863
0.822
0.784
0.747
0.713
0.681
0.65
6
0.837
0.79
0.746
0.705
0.666
0.63
0.596
7
0.933
0.871
0.813
0.76
0.711
0.665
0.623
0.583
0.547
8
0.923
0.853
0.789
0.731
0.677
0.627
0.582
0.54
0.502
9
0.914
0.766
0.703
0.645
0.592
0.544
0.5
0.46
10
0.905
0.82
0.744
0.676
0.614
0.558
0.508
0.463
0.422
11
0.896
0.804
0.722
0.585
0.527
0.475
0.429
0.388
12
0.887
0.788
0.701
0.625
0.557
0.497
0.444
0.397
0.356
13
0.879
0.773
0.601
0.53
0.469
0.415
0.368
0.326
14
0.87
0.758
0.661
0.577
0.505
0.442
0.34
0.299
15
0.861
0.743
0.642
0.555
0.481
0.417
0.362
0.315
0.275
16
0.728
0.534
0.458
0.394
0.339
0.292
0.252
17
0.844
0.714
0.605
0.513
0.436
0.371
0.317
0.27
0.231
18
0.836
0.7
0.587
0.494
0.416
0.35
0.296
0.25
0.212
19
0.828
0.686
0.57
0.396
0.331
0.277
0.232
0.194
20
0.673
0.554
0.456
0.377
0.312
0.258
0.215
0.178
21
0.811
0.66
0.538
0.439
0.359
0.294
0.242
0.199
0.164
22
0.803
0.647
0.522
0.342
0.278
0.226
0.184
0.15
23
0.795
0.634
0.507
0.406
0.262
0.211
0.17
0.138
24
0.622
0.492
0.39
0.31
0.247
0.197
0.158
0.126
25
0.78
0.61
0.478
0.375
0.295
0.233
0.146
0.116
26
0.598
0.464
0.361
0.281
0.22
0.172
0.135
0.106
27
0.764
0.586
0.45
0.347
0.268
0.207
0.161
0.125
0.098
28
0.757
0.574
0.437
0.333
0.255
0.196
29
0.749
0.563
0.424
0.321
0.243
0.185
0.141
0.107
0.082
30
0.742
0.552
0.412
0.308
0.174
0.131
0.099
0.075
35
0.706
0.355
0.253
0.181
0.13
0.094
0.068
0.049
40
0.672
0.453
0.307
0.208
0.142
0.097
0.067
0.046
0.032
Uniform Present Worth Factors
1.97
1.942
1.913
1.886
1.859
1.833
1.808
1.783
1.759
2.941
2.884
2.829
2.775
2.723
2.673
2.624
2.577
2.531
3.902
3.808
3.717
3.63
3.546
3.465
3.387
3.312
3.24
4.853
4.713
4.58
4.452
4.329
4.212
4.1
3.993
3.89
5.795
5.601
5.417
5.242
5.076
4.917
4.767
4.623
4.486
6.728
6.472
6.23
6.002
5.786
5.582
5.389
5.206
5.033
7.652
7.325
7.02
6.733
6.463
6.21
5.971
5.747
5.535
8.566
8.162
7.786
7.435
7.108
6.802
6.515
6.247
5.995
9.471
8.983
8.53
8.111
7.722
7.36
7.024
6.71
6.418
10.368
9.787
9.253
8.76
8.306
7.887
7.499
7.139
6.805
11.255
10.575
9.954
9.385
8.863
8.384
7.943
7.536
7.161
12.134
11.348
10.635
9.986
9.394
8.853
8.358
7.904
7.487
13.004
12.106
11.296
10.563
9.899
9.295
8.745
8.244
13.865
12.849
11.938
11.118
10.38
9.712
9.108
8.559
8.061
14.718
13.578
12.561
11.652
10.838
10.106
9.447
8.851
8.313
15.562
14.292
13.166
12.166
11.274
10.477
9.7.63
9.122
8.544
16.398
14.992
13.754
12.659
11.69
10.828
10.059
9.372
8.756
17.226
15.678
14.324
13.134
12.085
11.158
10.336
9.604
8.95
18.046
16.351
14.877
13.59
12.462
11.47
10.594
9.818
9.129
18.857
17.011
15.415
14.029
12.821
11.764
10.836
10.017
9.292
19.66
17.658
15.937
14.451
13.163
12.042
11.061
10.201
9.442
20.456
18.292
16.444
14.857
13.489
12.303
11.272
10.371
9.58
21.243
18.914
16.936
15.247
13.799
12.55
11.469
10.529
9.707
22.023
19.523
17.413
15.622
14.094
12.783
11.654
10.675
9.823
22.795
20.121
17.877
15.983
14.375
13.003
11.826
10.81
9.929
23.56
20.707
18.327
16.33
14.643
13.211
11.987
10.935
10.027
24.316
21.281
18.764
16.663
14.898
13.406
12.137
11.051
10.116
25.066
21.844
19.188
16.984
15.141
13.591
12.278
10.198
25.808
22.396
19.6
17.292
15.372
13.765
12.409
11.258
10.274
29.409
24.999
21.487
18.665
16.374
14.498
12.948
11.655
10.567
32.835
27.355
23.115
19.793
17.159
15.046
13.332
11.925
10.757
The discount rate selected for an LCC analysis has a large effect on the final results. It should reflect the potential earnings rate of the system owner. Whether the owner is a national government, small village, or an individual, money spent on a project could have been invested elsewhere and earned a certain rate of return. The nominal investment rate, however, is not an investor's real rate of return on money invested. Inflation, the tendency of prices to rise over time, will make future earnings worth less. Thus, inflation must be subtracted from an investor's nominal rate of return to get the net discount rate (or real opportunity cost of capital). For example, if the nominal investment rate was 7 percent, and general inflation was assumed to be 2 percent over the LCC period, the net discount rate that should be used would be 5 percent.
Different discount rates can be used for different commodities. For instance, fuel prices may be expected to rise faster than general inflation. In this case, a lower discount rate would be used when dealing with future fuel costs. In the example above the net discount rate was assumed to be 5 percent. If the cost of diesel fuel was expected to rise 1 percent faster than the general inflation rate, then a discount rate of 4 percent would be used for calculating the present worth of future fuel costs. Check with your local bank for their guess about future inflation rates for various goods and services. You have to make an estimate about future rates, realizing that an error in your guess can have a large affect on the LCC analysis results. If you use a discount rate that is too low, the future costs will be exaggerated; using a high discount rate does just the opposite, emphasizing initial costs over future costs. You may want to perform an LCC analysis with "high, low and medium" estimates on future rates to put bounds on the life-cycle cost of alternative systems.
1. The formula for the single present worth (P) of a future sum of money (F) in a given year (N) at a given discount rate (I) is
P = F/(1 + I)N.
2. The formula for the uniform present worth (P) of an annual sum (A) received over a period of years (N) at a given discount rate (I) is
P = A[1 - (1 + I)-N]/I.
3. The formula for the modified uniform present worth of an annual sum (A) that escalates at a rate (E) over a period of years (N) at a given discount rate (I) is
P = A{(1+E)/(I-E) *[1 - [ (1+E)/(1+I)]N]}
4. The formula for the annual payment (A) on a loan whose principal is (P) at an interest rate (I) for a given period of years (N) is
A = P{I/[1 - (1 + I)-N]}.
Back to PV
Acknowledgment and Disclaimer